| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication identifiers, take 4 |
| Date: | 2015-04-20 08:28:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20150420082802.GB25107@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-04-20 11:26:29 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I just realized that it talks about "replication identifier" as the new
> fundamental concept. The system table is called "pg_replication_identifier".
> But that's like talking about "index identifiers", instead of just indexes,
> and calling the system table pg_index_oid.
>
> The important concept this patch actually adds is the *origin* of each
> transaction. That term is already used in some parts of the patch. I think
> we should roughly do a search-replace of "replication identifier" ->
> "replication origin" to the patch. Or even "transaction origin".
Sounds good to me.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Svenne Krap | 2015-04-20 08:36:58 | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-04-20 08:26:29 | Re: Replication identifiers, take 4 |