Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole?

I sent the previous mail unfinished.

At Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:25:10 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20150409(dot)172510(dot)29010318(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
> Hello, sorry for the absence. I changed the regnamespace's
> behavior as the same as the other reg* types. And I attached a
> patch as separate one that fixes regroleout to do the same as the
> other reg* types, because I have

because, I doubt that it is appropriate way to do so.

> 0001-Add-regrole_v6.patch : fix regnamespace to behave as the
> same as the other reg* types.
>
> 0001-Make-regnamespace-behave-as-the-same-as-other-reg-ty.patch:
> Diff from v5 to v6, only for convinience.
>
> 0001-Fix-regroleout-s-behavior-following-other-out-functi.patch:
> Fixes regroleout so as to behave as the same as other reg*
> types, but might be a bit too large.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center