Re: Replication identifiers, take 4

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Replication identifiers, take 4
Date: 2015-04-07 15:58:18
Message-ID: 20150407155818.GG12291@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Why not just create a sequence? I suspect it may not be as fast to assign as
> an OID, but it's not like you'd be doing this all the time.

What does that have to do with the thread?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sawada Masahiko 2015-04-07 16:04:42 Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-04-07 15:57:27 Re: Replication identifiers, take 4