Re: Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Updated libpq5 packages cause connection errors on postgresql 9.2

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Chris Butler <cbutler(at)zedcore(dot)com>, "pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Updated libpq5 packages cause connection errors on postgresql 9.2
Date: 2015-04-01 16:09:07
Message-ID: 20150401160907.GJ4466@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-pkg-debian

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:27:05PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I haven't seen a specific number, it might depend on exactly which cipher is
> negotiated. See for example http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/
> What-is-the-reason-for-error-quot-SSL-negotiation-failed-error-04075070-rsa-routines-RSA-sign-digest-td43953.html
>
> All references I have foud say at least 2014 is safe and 512 is broken, but
> there are points in betwee nthat apparently works in some cases only.
>
> I think if we say "use 1024 bits or more" we err on the safe side. 

Did we ever decide on this?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-04-01 16:12:57 Re: Bogus WAL segments archived after promotion
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-04-01 16:04:40 Re: Tables cannot have INSTEAD OF triggers

Browse pgsql-pkg-debian by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2015-04-01 20:11:52 Re: Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Updated libpq5 packages cause connection errors on postgresql 9.2
Previous Message apt.postgresql.org repository 2015-04-01 13:20:06 postgis updated to version 2.1.7+dfsg-0~exp1.pgdg+1