Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown
Date: 2015-03-20 02:42:36
Message-ID: 20150320024236.GC6317@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:10:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I've certainly objected to it in the past, but I don't believe
> >> I was the only one objecting.
>
> > What's your feeling now?
>
> I'm prepared to yield on the point.

OK, are we up for changing the default pg_ctl shutdown method for 9.5,
("smart" to "fast"), or should we wait for 9.6?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-03-20 02:47:40 Re: ERRCODE_T_R_DEADLOCK_DETECTED
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-20 02:38:52 Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch