Re: flags argument for dsm_create

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: flags argument for dsm_create
Date: 2015-03-19 15:40:23
Message-ID: 20150319154023.GH3636@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-03-19 11:21:45 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > One question I struggled with is whether to keep the existing
> > dsm_create() signature intact and add a new function
> > dsm_create_extended(). I eventually decided against it. The
> > dsm_create() API is relatively new at this point, so there probably
> > aren't too many people who will be inconvenienced by an API break now.

> +1 for a clear API break.

Seconded.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-19 15:50:36 Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-03-19 15:25:45 Re: flags argument for dsm_create