Re: Strange assertion using VACOPT_FREEZE in vacuum.c

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strange assertion using VACOPT_FREEZE in vacuum.c
Date: 2015-03-18 01:51:46
Message-ID: 20150318015146.GS3636@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > 1. ordered the argument list to vacuum(), hopefully it's more sensible
> > now.
>
> Fine for me.

Actually, why don't we move va_cols to VacuumParams too?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-03-18 01:58:00 Re: Strange assertion using VACOPT_FREEZE in vacuum.c
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-03-18 01:06:27 Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position