Re: Strange assertion using VACOPT_FREEZE in vacuum.c

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strange assertion using VACOPT_FREEZE in vacuum.c
Date: 2015-03-17 17:31:57
Message-ID: 20150317173157.GJ29780@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> I went to change this patch status in the commitfest app, and the app
> told me I cannot change the status in the current commitfest. Please
> somebody with commitfest mace superpowers set it as ready for committer.

I'm afraid the issue is a business decision which is incorrect as it's
complaining that it's in a "Closed" state and you're trying to change it
to an "Open" state. While it's neat to think a patch could never be
reopened, it's clearly not accurate.

Adding Magnus to this, as I'm pretty sure he has some code to go hack
(or perhaps just remove.. :).

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-17 17:32:09 Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-03-17 17:29:24 Re: Strange assertion using VACOPT_FREEZE in vacuum.c