Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Date: 2015-03-11 05:31:08
Message-ID: 20150311053108.GA295158@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:06:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> What I do care about
> is that we as a project have to at some point be willing to begin
> closing the spigot on new patches and focusing on polishing and
> shipping the patches we've already got. I think it's perfectly
> reasonable to worry about where we are on that continuum when it's
> already several weeks after the start of the last CommitFest, but if
> I'm in the minority on that, so be it.

I am in your minority on that point.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-03-11 05:40:40 Re: moving from contrib to bin
Previous Message Noah Misch 2015-03-11 05:28:33 Re: Question about lazy_space_alloc() / linux over-commit