Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs?
Date: 2015-03-04 19:29:56
Message-ID: 20150304192956.GP3291@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> This points out a real reason for per-language, if not per-PUG) lists
> --- you can't just say posting to pgsql-general is good for non-English
> speakers.

We already have per-language mailing lists, and new ones have always
been created on demand. There isn't the same level of policy on them as
there is for PUG lists.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2015-03-04 21:21:45 Re: PostgreSQL Windows Installer Licence
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-04 19:29:45 Re: What do we need for new PUGs?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-03-05 00:44:08 Re: What do we need for new PUGs?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-04 19:29:45 Re: What do we need for new PUGs?