From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Renaming MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren to MemoryContextReset |
Date: | 2015-02-26 22:31:16 |
Message-ID: | 20150226223116.GI24199@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2015-02-26 17:01:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> We've discussed doing $SUBJECT off and on for nearly ten years,
> the oldest thread I could find about it being here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1186435268(dot)16321(dot)37(dot)camel(at)dell(dot)linuxdev(dot)us(dot)dell(dot)com
> It's come up again every time we found another leak of dead child
> contexts, which happened twice last year for example. And that patch
> I'm pushing for "expanded" out-of-line objects really needs this to
> become the default behavior anywhere that we can detoast objects.
I don't object to the behavioural change per se, rather the contrary,
but I find it a pretty bad idea to change the meaning of an existing
functioname this way. Without a compiler erroring out people won't
notice that suddenly MemoryContextReset deletes much more; leading to
possibly hard to find errors. Context resets frequently are in error
paths, and those won't necessarily be hit when running with assertions
enabled.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-02-26 22:31:44 | Re: json_populate_record issue - TupleDesc reference leak |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-02-26 22:16:59 | Re: Renaming MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren to MemoryContextReset |