Re: collations in shared catalogs?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: collations in shared catalogs?
Date: 2015-02-25 21:19:45
Message-ID: 20150225211945.GC24199@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-02-25 15:59:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2015-02-25 12:08:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The most obvious fix is to change "provider" to a NAME column.
>
> > Yea. I'm not sure why that wasn't done initially. I can't really see the
> > length be an issue. How about we add an error check enforcing ascii,
> > that'll work in the back branches?
>
> Nope, that won't help much at all. C vs en_US for instance is different
> sort orders even with all-ASCII data.

Ick, yes. The restriction to a charset that's encodable in all server
encodings should be there additionally, but it's not sufficient :(

> Basically you're screwed if you've got different collations in different
> databases and you put anything into pg_shseclabel ...

Hrmpf.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-02-25 22:04:55 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and logical decoding
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-02-25 20:59:55 Re: collations in shared catalogs?