From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: NOT NULL markings for BKI columns |
Date: | 2015-02-20 22:06:50 |
Message-ID: | 20150220220650.GR2500@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-02-15 12:54:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > BTW, the precedent of PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY would suggest calling
> > this one PG_FORCE_NOT_NULL, or at least using underscores for word
> > breaks in whatever we end up calling it.
>
> I've named it BKI_FORCE_(NOT_)?NULL.
>
> So, I've implemented this - turned out to be a bit more work than I'd
> expected... I had to whack around the representation Catalog.pm returns
> for columns, but I think the new representation for columns is better
> anyway. Doesn't look too bad.
Just gave it a quick read, I think it's good. +1 for your
implementation.
> I've also added BKI_FORCE_NULL as you mentioned it as being possibly
> useful, was easy enough. I haven't identified a user so far though, so
> we could just remove it if we want.
I think we should just save this part of the patch until some use turns up.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2015-02-20 22:07:55 | Re: Question about durability and postgresql. |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-02-20 21:58:42 | Re: Idea: GSoC - Query Rewrite with Materialized Views |