Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Arne Scheffer <arne(dot)scheffer(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement
Date: 2015-02-17 15:12:06
Message-ID: 20150217151206.GE2895@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-02-17 15:50:39 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 17/02/15 03:07, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> >On 17/02/15 03:03, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>On 02/16/2015 08:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>>>Average of 3 runs of read-only pgbench on my system all with
> >>>>pg_stat_statement activated:
> >>>>HEAD: 20631
> >>>>SQRT: 20533
> >>>>SQRTD: 20592

> >>>So using sqrtd the cost is 0.18%. I think that's acceptable.

> >>Actually, sqrt/sqrtd is not called in accumulating the stats, only in
> >>the reporting function. So it looks like the difference here should be
> >>noise. Maybe we need some longer runs.

> >Yes there are variations between individual runs so it might be really
> >just that, I can leave it running for much longer time tomorrow.

> Ok so I let it run for more than hour on a different system, the difference
> is negligible - 14461 vs 14448 TPS. I think there is bigger difference
> between individual runs than between the two versions...

These numbers sound like you measured them without concurrency, am I
right? If so, the benchmark isn't that interesting - the computation
happens while a spinlock is held, and that'll mainly matter if there are
many backends running at the same time.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-02-17 15:18:49 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2015 - mentors, students and admins.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-02-17 15:09:43 Re: Strange assertion using VACOPT_FREEZE in vacuum.c