Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments
Date: 2015-02-17 08:46:20
Message-ID: 20150217084620.GA4149@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-02-17 12:18:41 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Somewhat uckily it's 9.2 only (9.3, 9.4 and master look correct, earlier
> > releases don't have pg_receivexlog)
>
> Are you planning to back-patch the fix to 9.2?

Yes, but I want to look through all versions, to make sure there's no
other merge resolution mistakes lurking.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2015-02-17 09:26:09 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Previous Message Naoya Anzai 2015-02-17 08:16:26 Re: Table-level log_autovacuum_min_duration