| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RLS bug? |
| Date: | 2015-01-29 02:57:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20150129025747.GG3854@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Peter,
* Peter Geoghegan (pg(at)heroku(dot)com) wrote:
> Why is the policy "test2" not listed as applying only "FOR UPDATE"? If
> this is the intended behavior, it is not consistent with the
> documentation, which states: "Using UPDATE for a policy means that it
> will apply to UPDATE commands".
It wasn't intentional and I had been meaning to get to it, but Tom beat
me to it. master now handles this correctly.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2015-01-29 09:22:00 | Re: BUG #12690: EXECUTE statement fails with dynamic column name on record variable |
| Previous Message | olaf.gw | 2015-01-28 18:12:43 | BUG #12694: crash if the number of result rows is lower than gin_fuzzy_search_limit |