Re: Parallel Seq Scan

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, John Gorman <johngorman2(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date: 2015-01-28 16:02:30
Message-ID: 20150128160230.GW3854@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> Such i/o systems do exist, but a single RAID5 group over spinning rust
> with a simple filter isn't going to cut it with a modern CPU- we're just
> too darn efficient to end up i/o bound in that case.

err, to *not* end up i/o bound.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-01-28 16:08:46 Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-01-28 15:58:40 Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD