|From:||David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>|
|To:||Daniel Bausch <bausch(at)dvs(dot)tu-darmstadt(dot)de>|
|Subject:||Re: Parallel Seq Scan|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:02:37AM +0100, Daniel Bausch wrote:
> Hi PG devs!
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Wait for first IO, issue second IO request
> >> Compute
> >> Already have second IO request, issue third
> >> ...
> >> We'd be a lot less sensitive to IO latency.
> > It would take about five minutes of coding to prove or disprove this:
> > stick a PrefetchBuffer call into heapgetpage() to launch a request for the
> > next page as soon as we've read the current one, and then see if that
> > makes any obvious performance difference. I'm not convinced that it will,
> > but if it did then we could think about how to make it work for real.
> Sorry for dropping in so late...
> I have done all this two years ago. For TPC-H Q8, Q9, Q17, Q20, and Q21
> I see a speedup of ~100% when using IndexScan prefetching + Nested-Loops
> Look-Ahead (the outer loop!).
> (On SSD with 32 Pages Prefetch/Look-Ahead + Cold Page Cache / Small RAM)
Would you be so kind as to pass along any patches (ideally applicable
to git master), tests, and specific measurements you made?
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
|Next Message||Robert Haas||2015-01-27 15:20:21||Re: pg_upgrade and rsync|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2015-01-27 14:50:59||Re: pg_upgrade and rsync|