From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD |
Date: | 2015-01-27 01:04:07 |
Message-ID: | 20150127010407.GF4655@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-01-26 19:58:25 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:43:41AM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > master + 32align.patch:
> > -c max_connections=400
> > tps = 183791.872359 (high run vs. run variability)
> > -c max_connections=401
> > tps = 185494.98244 (high run vs. run variability)
> >
> > master + 64align.patch:
> > -c max_connections=400
> > tps = 489257.195570
> > -c max_connections=401
> > tps = 490496.520632
> >
> > Pretty much as expected, rigth?
>
> Yes, I am convinced. Let's work on a patch now.
Since I can reproduce some minor (1-3%) performance *regressions* at low
client counts when aligning every shmem allocation, I'm inclined to just
add special case code to BufferShmemSize()/InitBufferPool() to align
descriptors to PG_CACHE_LINE_SIZE. That's really unlikely to regress
anythign as it basically can't be a bad idea to align buffer
descriptors.
Contrary opinions? Robert?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-01-27 02:03:10 | Re: basebackups during ALTER DATABASE ... SET TABLESPACE ... not safe? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-01-27 00:58:25 | Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD |