Re: PQputCopyEnd doesn't adhere to its API contract

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQputCopyEnd doesn't adhere to its API contract
Date: 2015-01-22 18:30:25
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 03:04:19PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Uh, where are we on this?
> >
> > I think someone needs to take Tom's proposed language and make it into
> > a patch. And figure out which other functions in the documentation
> > need similar updates.
> I have developed such a patch --- attached. I didn't see any other
> mentions of blocking in the docs.

Patch applied.

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-01-22 18:56:07 Re: basebackups during ALTER DATABASE ... SET TABLESPACE ... not safe?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-01-22 18:19:40 Re: New CF app deployment