Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL

* Jim Nasby (Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com) wrote:
> On 1/21/15 5:38 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >Being startup-only won't help if the user is a superuser.
>
> Crap, I thought postgresql.auto.conf was handled as an #include and therefore you could still preempt it via postgresql.conf

It's not just that.. Having superuser access should really be
considered equivilant to having a shell as the unix user that postgres
is running as.

> >If this is being done for every execution of a query then I agree- SQL
> >or plpgsql probably wouldn't be fast enough. That doesn't mean it makes
> >sense to have pgaudit support calling a C function, it simply means that
> >we need to find another way to configure auditing (which is what I think
> >I've done...).
>
> I'm still nervous about overloading this onto the roles system; I think it will end up being very easy to accidentally break. But if others think it'll work then I guess I'm just being paranoid.

Break in which way..? If you're saying "it'll be easy for a user to
misconfigure" then I might agree with you- but documentation and
examples can help to address that. If you're worried that future PG
hacking will break it, well, I tend to doubt the GRANT piece is the area
of concern there- the recent development work is really around event
triggers and adding new object classes; the GRANT components have been
reasonably stable for the past few years.

Thanks!

Stephen