| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
| Date: | 2015-01-18 15:01:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20150118150155.GF1663@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-01-18 12:56:59 +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> > and therefore moving it to src/bin seems like a wrong move on two counts?
>
> I personally agree that that pg_standby shouldn't be moved. Even if we
> could not find agreement to remove it, there's little reason to move it
> imo. My reading of the previous discussion was that we're far from alone
> with that position.
There was clear agreement on a set of things tomove, and as I recall
pg_standby was not in it. Wasn't this patch series updated to comply
with what was agreed?
> That's why I'd like to have the patchseries in a way that individual
> moves can be applied separately.
Yeah.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Langille | 2015-01-18 15:11:21 | PGCon 2015 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-01-18 13:21:55 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |