Re: RLS bug?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RLS bug?
Date: 2015-01-07 20:35:09
Message-ID: 20150107203509.GD3062@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Peter,

* Peter Geoghegan (pg(at)heroku(dot)com) wrote:
> Why is the policy "test2" not listed as applying only "FOR UPDATE"? If
> this is the intended behavior, it is not consistent with the
> documentation, which states: "Using UPDATE for a policy means that it
> will apply to UPDATE commands".

Yeah, that looks like an issue.. I'll look into it.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

  • RLS bug? at 2015-01-06 21:52:04 from Peter Geoghegan

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tneumann 2015-01-07 21:39:32 BUG #12458: Comparison with CHAR is inconsistent between string types
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-01-07 19:45:51 Re: Patch: [BUGS] BUG #12320: json parsing with embedded double quotes