Re: Some other odd buildfarm failures

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some other odd buildfarm failures
Date: 2014-12-26 16:35:46
Message-ID: 20141226163546.GD1645@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I've not proven this rigorously, but it seems obvious in hindsight:
> >> what's happening is that when the object_address test drops everything
> >> with DROP CASCADE, other processes are sometimes just starting to execute
> >> the event trigger when the DROP commits. When they go to look up the
> >> trigger function, they don't find it, leading to "cache lookup failed for
> >> function".
>
> > Hm, maybe we can drop the event trigger explicitely first, then wait a
> > little bit, then drop the remaining objects with DROP CASCADE?
>
> As I said, that's no fix; it just makes the timing harder to hit. Another
> process could be paused at the critical point for longer than whatever "a
> little bit" is.

Yeah, I was thinking we could play some games with the currently running
XIDs from a txid_snapshot or some such, with a reasonable upper limit on
the waiting time (for the rare cases with a server doing other stuff
with long-running transactions.)

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-12-26 16:47:35 Re: Some other odd buildfarm failures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-12-26 16:27:02 Re: Some other odd buildfarm failures