| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commit timestamp abbreviations |
| Date: | 2014-12-24 14:15:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20141224141534.GB15375@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:00:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
> > head:
> >
> > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0
> > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared: 0
> >
> > I thought we got rid of the idea that 'Ts' means timestamp. Was this
> > part forgotten?
>
> Do you have a specific reference? That's not the concern I remember,
> and I sure don't want to re-read that whole thread again.
I remember the issue of using _ts and 'ts' inconsistently, and I thought
we were going to spell out timestamp in more places, but maybe I am
remembering incorrectly.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-12-24 15:00:05 | Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2014-12-24 14:08:50 | Re: replicating DROP commands across servers |