From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, Mitsumasa KONDO <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement |
Date: | 2014-12-21 18:23:27 |
Message-ID: | 20141221182326.GA1768@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On my blog Peter Geoghegan mentioned something about "atomic fetch-and-add"
> being useful here, but I'm not quite sure what that's referring to. Perhaps
> someone can give me a pointer.
The point, I think, is that without atomic instructions you have to hold
a lock while incrementing the counters.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-12-21 18:25:43 | Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-12-21 18:21:56 | Re: PrivateRefCount patch has got issues |