Re: [Bug] Inconsistent result for inheritance and FOR UPDATE.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Bug] Inconsistent result for inheritance and FOR UPDATE.
Date: 2014-12-19 02:21:28
Message-ID: 20141219022128.GB26676@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:57:54AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We seem not to have had a new release of 9.2 since July, which is an
> > awfully long time ago. So, hopefully soon?
>
> Nothing's likely to happen during the holidays, so probably mid-January
> is the earliest feasible target.
>
> I agree we're a bit overdue.

In our defense, we had the need for too many 9.3.X releases too closely,
so in some sense I am glad we didn't feel a dire need to release another
9.3.X recently. I agree with Tom that mid-January is likely.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-12-19 02:40:34 Re: NUMERIC private methods?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-12-19 01:37:31 Re: Commitfest problems