Re: Fractions in GUC variables

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, John Gorman <johngorman2(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fractions in GUC variables
Date: 2014-12-15 15:50:12
Message-ID: 20141215155012.GB9827@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:19:19AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Overall, I feel that this isn't really worth the trouble. We use
> > fractions consistently now, so there isn't much room for confusion over
> > what the current values mean. Using a percentage might be more familiar
> > for some people, but OTOH you'll have to get used to the fractions
> > anyway, unless we change the default output format too, and I'm not in
> > favour of doing that. I suggest that we just drop this, and remove the
> > TODO item.
>
> Agreed.
>
> The patch is sound as far as it goes (I might be inclined to accept
> whitespace between number and % sign), but given the above points and
> the original reason for it having been eliminated, I'm inclined to drop it.

TODO item removed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-12-15 16:12:09 Re: Making BackgroundWorkerHandle a complete type or offering a worker enumeration API?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-12-15 15:49:29 Re: Something is broken in logical decoding with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS