| From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Cc: | hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Escaping from blocked send() reprised. |
| Date: | 2014-12-15 09:19:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20141215.181926.72089914.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Since I don't have clear idea how to promote this, I will remake
and be back with new patch based on Andres' for patches.
> Hmm.. Sorry for my stupidity.
>
> > Why is that necessary? It seems really rather wrong to make
> > BIO_set_retry_write() dependant on ProcDiePending? Especially as, at
> > least in my testing, it's not even required because the be_tls_write()
> > can just check the error properly?
>
> I mistook the previous conversation as it doesn't work as
> expected. I confirmed that it works fine.
>
> After all, it works as I expected. The parameter for
> ProcessClientWriteInterrupt() looks somewhat uneasy but the patch
> 4 looks fine as a whole. Do you have anything to worry about in
> the patch?
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2014-12-15 09:21:16 | Re: alter user/role CURRENT_USER |
| Previous Message | Samrat Revagade | 2014-12-15 09:16:02 | Re: pg_rewind in contrib |