Re: moving from contrib to bin

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: moving from contrib to bin
Date: 2014-12-13 03:04:59
Message-ID: 20141213030459.GA28572@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:57:55PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > On 12/12/14 10:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think pg_upgrade should continue to have SQL scripts that create and
> >> delete the SQL function definitions for these.
>
> > That won't actually work very easily. LANGUAGE internal functions need
> > to be in fmgr_builtins, and the only way to get them there is by listing
> > them in pg_proc.h. (We could drop the functions in initdb, but seems
> > kind of silly.)
>
> Oh, good point.
>
> > The functions do already check themselves that they are called in binary
> > upgrade mode, so exposing them in pg_proc doesn't seem risky.
>
> Fair enough ... binary upgrade mode is not readily accessible, right?

Well, the postmaster allows anyone to use the flag, while the backends
have:

case 'b':
/* Undocumented flag used for binary upgrades */
if (secure)
IsBinaryUpgrade = true;
break;

which means it can only be passed in from the postmaster. I think only
the super-user can set postmaster options.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-12-13 03:56:07 Re: Commitfest problems
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2014-12-13 02:24:51 Re: On partitioning