From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Phil Currier <pcurrier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: logical column ordering |
Date: | 2014-12-10 17:10:51 |
Message-ID: | 20141210171051.GC10741@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-12-10 12:06:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Ultimately, I think this is mostly going to be a question of what
> Alvaro feels comfortable with; he's presumably going to have a better
> sense of where and to what extent there might be bugs lurking than any
> of the rest of us. But the point is worth considering, because I
> think we would probably all agree that having a release that is stable
> and usable right out of the gate is more important than having any
> single feature get into that release.
Sure, 9.4 needs to be out of the gate. I don't think anybody doubts
that.
But the scheduling of commits with regard to the 9.5 schedule actually
opens a relevant question: When are we planning to release 9.5? Because
If we try ~ one year from now it's a whole different ballgame than if we
try to go back to september. And I think there's pretty good arguments
for both.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-12-10 17:57:04 | Re: advance local xmin more aggressively |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-12-10 17:06:11 | Re: logical column ordering |