Re: moving from contrib to bin

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: moving from contrib to bin
Date: 2014-12-09 05:00:22
Message-ID: 20141209050022.GA4922@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-12-08 22:50:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not exactly convinced that we want to encourage packagers to include
> either pg_test_fsync or pg_test_timing in standard packages. They are not
> all that useful to ordinary users.

I actually think both are quite useful when setting up new systems to
quickly screen for problems. There still is a fairly large number of
virtualized systems with pretty much broken timing functions; and
checking whether fsync actually takes some time is also good thing to do
in virtualized environments - it's not an infrequent thing to see fsyncs
taking unrealistically low time.

Neither is likely to be harmful. So it doesn't seem harmful to move
them.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-12-09 05:15:53 Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-12-09 04:34:01 Re: On partitioning