Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation
Date: 2014-11-25 17:15:58
Message-ID: 20141125171557.GN28859@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Adam Brightwell (adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com) wrote:
> > * int64 (C) to int8 (SQL) mapping for genbki.
> >
> > That definitely should be a separate patch. Which can be committed much
> > earlier than the rest - even if we don't actually end up needing it for
> > this feature, it's still good to have it.
>
>
> Agreed. I had previously submitted this as a separate patch, but I think
> it got lost in the weeds. At any rate, here is the relevant post:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKRt6CTgJdeGFqXevrp-DizaeHmg8gNVqu8n5T=ix3JAvpwwDQ@mail.gmail.com

Yeah, done now.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Brightwell 2014-11-25 17:18:29 Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-11-25 17:14:11 Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review