Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
Date: 2014-11-14 16:43:06
Message-ID: 20141114164306.GB815495@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Noah Misch (noah(at)leadboat(dot)com) wrote:
> >> I'd agree for a new design, but I see too little to gain from changing it now.
> >> Today's behavior is fine.
>
> > To clarify- you mean with the changes described- using usesuper for
> > rolreplication and rolbypassrls instead of 'false' when dumping from
> > older versions, correct?
>
> I think Noah is arguing for leaving the pg_dumpall queries as they
> stand. I disagree, but he's entitled to his opinion.

Yes, that. (Adopt Gilles Darold's fix, of course.)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-11-14 16:47:05 Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-11-14 16:24:20 Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS