Re: WAL replay bugs

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL replay bugs
Date: 2014-11-05 12:46:00
Message-ID: 20141105124600.GG1791@alvin.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:

> Now, do we really want this feature in-core? That's somewhat a duplicate of
> what is mentioned here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQMq=4eJAK317mxZ4Has0i+1rSLBQU29zx18JwLB2j1OA@mail.gmail.com
> Of course both things do not have the same coverage as the former is for
> buildfarm and dev, while the latter is dedidated to production systems, but
> could be used for development as well.

Oh, I had forgotten that other patch.

> The patch sent there is a bit outdated, but a potential implementation gets
> simpler with XLogReadBufferForRedo able to return flags about each block
> state during redo. I am still planning to come back to it for this cycle,
> though I stopped for now waiting for the WAL format patches finish to shape
> the APIs this feature would rely on.

I agree it makes sense to wait until the WAL reworks are done -- glad
to hear you're putting some time in this area.

Thanks,

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2014-11-05 13:24:48 Representing a SRF return column in catalogs
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-11-05 12:45:31 Re: Sequence Access Method WIP