Re: Proposal for better support of time-varying timezone abbreviations

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for better support of time-varying timezone abbreviations
Date: 2014-11-04 16:29:59
Message-ID: 20141104162959.GA6430@feivel.credativ.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:32:41AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion about which of the above things to do ...
> what's your preference?

I think it's better for the future if me make a clean cut. Yes, the option
keeps compatability a little bit higher, but that doesn't matter that much as
the codes won't be used by the server anyway. Besides, they may eventually
change and then we have to make sure to remember ecpg's copy again.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-11-04 16:33:34 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Previous Message Kevin Wooten 2014-11-04 16:22:27 Re: [HACKERS] Pipelining executions to postgresql server