| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage |
| Date: | 2014-10-27 14:47:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20141027144729.GR28859@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
All,
* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> It would be weird if it were inconsistent: some things require role
> membership, some things require SET ROLE. Try explaining that.
Attached is a patch to address the pg_cancel/terminate_backend and the
statistics info as discussed previously. It sounds like we're coming to
consensus that this is the correct approach. Comments are always
welcome, of course, but it's a pretty minor patch and I'd like to move
forward with it soon against master.
We'll rebase the role attributes patch with these changes and update
that patch for review (with a few other changes) after.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-10-27 14:48:19 | Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-10-27 14:33:02 | Re: jsonb generator functions |