Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
Date: 2014-10-27 14:47:29
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> It would be weird if it were inconsistent: some things require role
> membership, some things require SET ROLE. Try explaining that.

Attached is a patch to address the pg_cancel/terminate_backend and the
statistics info as discussed previously. It sounds like we're coming to
consensus that this is the correct approach. Comments are always
welcome, of course, but it's a pretty minor patch and I'd like to move
forward with it soon against master.

We'll rebase the role attributes patch with these changes and update
that patch for review (with a few other changes) after.



In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-10-27 14:48:19 Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-10-27 14:33:02 Re: jsonb generator functions