Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
Date: 2014-10-25 12:28:26
Message-ID: 20141025122826.GP1791@alvin.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thom Brown wrote:
> On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> writes:
> > > Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose ends
> > > you found.
> >
> > Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses what
> > seems to me to be a saner (more extensible) catalog representation, and
> > contains assorted other code cleanup. I have not touched the
> > documentation at all except for catalogs.sgml, so it still explains the
> > old syntax. I have to stop working on this now, because I've already
> > expended more time on it than I should, and it still has the serious
> > problems mentioned in
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/16787.1351053391@sss.pgh.pa.us
> > and
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/28389.1351094795@sss.pgh.pa.us
> >
> > I'm going to mark this Returned With Feedback for the current CF.
> >
>
> Does anyone have any intention of resurrecting this at this stage?

Not in this room. Do you?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-10-25 12:46:33 Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-10-25 12:22:19 Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]