Re: Append to a GUC parameter ?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Append to a GUC parameter ?
Date: 2014-10-11 22:58:05
Message-ID: 20141011225805.GP21267@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:04:47AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > > > BTW, while there's unlikely to be a good reason to put search_path in
> > > > pg.conf with appends, there are a LOT of reasons to want to be able to
> > > > append to it during a session.
> > >
> > > [shrug...] You can do that today with current_setting()/set_config().
> >
> > With a very simple statement you can do that:
>
> Of course, this doesn't solve the requirement that started this thread,
> which is about having "includeable" pg.conf fragments to enable
> extensions.

Should this be a TODO item?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-10-12 00:25:32 Re: psql output change in 9.4
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-10-11 22:54:32 Re: pg_ctl non-idempotent behavior change