Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Arthur Silva <arthurprs(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4
Date: 2014-10-03 18:42:29
Message-ID: 20141003184229.GJ14522@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 03:30:35PM -0300, Arthur Silva wrote:
> > Every GUC add complexity to the system because people have to understand
> > it to know if they should tune it. No GUC is zero-cost.
>
> Please see my blog post about the cost of adding GUCs:
>
> http://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2009.html#January_10_2009
>
> That's true Bruce (nice post, it was a good reading).
> But how can we ignore 25%+ improvements (from 8 to 24)?
> At very least we should delivery some pretty good defaults.

Well, checkpoint_segments was a similar case where we couldn't give good
tuning advice so we went with a server log file warning if it needed to
be increased --- this might be a similar case.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-10-03 18:49:14 Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-10-03 18:42:24 Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4