Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)
Date: 2014-09-29 16:05:20
Message-ID: 20140929160520.GX16422@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert,

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Attached is a contrib module that lets you launch arbitrary command in
> a background worker, and supporting infrastructure patches for core.

Very cool! Started looking into this while waiting on a few
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS runs to finish (ugh...).

Perhaps I'm just being a bit over the top, but all this per-character
work feels a bit ridiculous.. When we're using MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF, I
suppose it's not so bad, but is there no hope to increase that and make
this whole process more efficient? Just a thought.

After reading through the code for 0001, I decided to actually take it
out for a spin- see attached. I then passed a few megabytes of data
through it and it seemed to work just fine.

In general, I'm quite excited about this capability and will be looking
over the later patches also. I also prefer the function-pointer based
approach which was taken up in later versions to the hook-based approach
in the initial patches, so glad to see things going in that direction.
Lastly, I will say that I feel it'd be good to support bi-directional
communication as I think it'll be needed eventually, but I'm not sure
that has to happen now.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment Content-Type Size
test-shm_mq_sendv.c text/x-csrc 4.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message searcher s 2014-09-29 16:06:10 Full_page_write is off in backup mode
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2014-09-29 15:59:08 Re: open items for 9.4