Re: missing isinf declaration on solaris

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: missing isinf declaration on solaris
Date: 2014-09-25 14:01:31
Message-ID: 20140925140131.GC15776@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-09-25 10:56:56 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > From VS 2013 onwards they're trying hard to be C99 and C11 compatible.
>
> Sounds great. Is VS2013 released already?

Yes.

> If so, maybe we can think about moving to C99 in 2016 or so; at least
> assuming you can build for

I think we should simply pick and choose the features we want. And go
for it now. Besidesthe fact that one of them wasn't applied, I'd sent
patches a couple months back that'd allow setting up a buildfarm animal
failing for any patch going above C89 + chosen features.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2014-09-25 14:02:25 Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-09-25 13:57:29 Re: a fast bloat measurement tool (was Re: Measuring relation free space)