| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes |
| Date: | 2014-09-11 17:40:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20140911174029.GH16199@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 02:54:39PM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > I am open to improved wording. :-)
>
> Instead of:
>
> hash indexes are not WAL-logged so they are not crash-safe and cannot be used on streaming standbys
>
> how about?:
>
> hash indexes are not WAL-logged and thus are not crash-safe and cannot be used on standby servers
>
> That seems consistent with the terminology used here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/warm-standby.html
Change applied. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-09-11 17:41:37 | Re: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-09-11 17:29:23 | Re: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes |