From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration? |
Date: | 2014-09-11 00:49:57 |
Message-ID: | 20140911004957.GE16199@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:09:30PM -0400, David Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 03:40:45PM -0400, David Johnston wrote:
>
> > "In addition to setting global defaults or attaching" <- add a comma
> after
> > "defaults"
>
> I didn't like this change as it causes too many comma phrases.
>
> Attaches are the changes since yesterday's patch. The full patch is at:
>
> ftp://momjian.us/postgresql/mypatches/config.diff
>
>
>
> At minimum the word "setting" in that paragraph needs to be made plural. ",
> you can pass settings to <productname>PostgreSQL..."
Oh, good point, fixed.
> I'm not particularly fond of the overly long preamble burying the "shell
> facilities" - and the resultant comma separating the two - but cannot think of
> anything better. Not having the transition makes it too short and curt. The
> proposed second comma helped to at least break it up but it too doesn't sound
> all that great.
>
> I'm good for just making the plural fix and calling it a day.
Modified patch applied to head and 9.4.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G Johnston | 2014-09-11 01:20:00 | Re: NULL as a (pseudo-)value not described? |
Previous Message | David Johnston | 2014-09-11 00:09:30 | Re: [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Xiaoyulei | 2014-09-11 03:08:56 | about half processes are blocked by btree, btree is bottleneck? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-09-11 00:18:58 | Re: Inaccuracy in VACUUM's tuple count estimates |