| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and epoch |
| Date: | 2014-09-05 23:35:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20140905233542.GG26717@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:26:55AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I have developed the attached patch which causes pg_upgrade to preserve
> > the transaction epoch. I plan to apply this for PG 9.5.
>
> I would say this is a simple bug and should be back patched to 9.4 and
> 9.3. We're only going to continue to get complaints from people
> running into this.
Yes, I did think about that, but it seems like a behavior change.
However, it is tempting to avoid future bug reports about this.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-09-05 23:39:36 | Re: Need Multixact Freezing Docs |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2014-09-05 23:26:55 | Re: pg_upgrade and epoch |