Re: Misleading error message in logical decoding for binary plugins

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Misleading error message in logical decoding for binary plugins
Date: 2014-09-03 14:45:36
Message-ID: 20140903144536.GC4298@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-09-03 09:36:32 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 2014-08-29 22:42:46 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Using a plugin producing binary output, I came across this error:
> >> =# select data from pg_logical_slot_peek_changes('foo', NULL, NULL);
> >> ERROR: 0A000: output plugin cannot produce binary output
> >> LOCATION: pg_logical_slot_get_changes_guts, logicalfuncs.c:404
> >>
> >> Shouldn't the error message be here something like "binary output plugin
> >> cannot produce textual output"? The plugin used in my case produces binary
> >> output, but what is requested from it with pg_logical_slot_peek_changes is
> >> textual output.
> >
> > I don't like the new message much. It's imo even more misleading than
> > the old message. How about
> > "output pluing produces binary output but the sink only accepts textual data"?
>
> Maybe:
>
> ERROR: pg_logical_slot_peek_changes cannot be used with a plugin that
> produces only binary output
> HINT: Use pg_logical_slot_peek_binary_changes instead.

That level has no knowledge of what it's used by, so I think that'd
require bigger changes than worth it.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-09-03 14:46:07 Re: LIMIT for UPDATE and DELETE
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-09-03 14:44:57 Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?