Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins
Date: 2014-08-29 22:08:34
Message-ID: 20140829220834.GJ10109@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-08-26 22:04:03 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> That's all I see on a first-read through.

I think I fixed all of them. Thanks.

> There might be other
> issues, and I haven't checked through it in great detail for mundane
> bugs, but generally, I favor pressing on relatively rapidly toward a
> commit. It seems highly likely that this idea is a big win, and if
> there's some situation in which it's a loss, we're more likely to find
> out with it in the tree (and thus likely to be tested by many more
> people) than by analysis from first principles.

Attached is the version I plan to commit after going over it again
tomorrow.

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Make-backend-local-tracking-of-buffer-pins-memory-ef.patch text/x-patch 21.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stepan Rutz 2014-08-29 22:15:02 Patch for psql History Display on MacOSX
Previous Message Gianni Ciolli 2014-08-29 21:59:02 Re: Why data of timestamptz does not store value of timezone passed to it?