Re: Is this a bug?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
Date: 2014-08-25 21:07:28
Message-ID: 20140825210728.GB14956@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:04:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 03:12:47PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > >> Yes, you remember well. I will have to find a different way for
> > >> pg_upgrade to call a no-op ALTER TABLE, which is fine.
> > >
> > > Looking at the ALTER TABLE options, I am going to put this check in a
> > > !IsBinaryUpgrade block so pg_upgrade can still use its trick.
> >
> > -1, that's really ugly.
> >
> > Maybe the right solution is to add a form of ALTER TABLE that is
> > specifically defined to do only this check. This is an ongoing need,
> > so that might not be out of line.
>
> Ah, seems ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT IF EXISTS also works --- I
> will use that.

OK, attached patch applied, with pg_upgrade adjustments. I didn't
think the original regression tests for this were necessary.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
option.diff text/x-diff 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2014-08-25 21:15:31 Re: SKIP LOCKED DATA (work in progress)
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-08-25 21:05:40 Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS