Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED
Date: 2014-08-22 18:32:38
Message-ID: 20140822183238.GN6343@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> Em sexta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2014, Alvaro Herrera <
> alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> escreveu:
>
> > Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> >
> > > I forgot to mention... I did again a lot of tests using different
> > > replication scenarios to make sure all is ok:
> > > - slaves async
> > > - slaves sync
> > > - cascade slaves
> >
> > On v13 you mean?
> >
> Exactly!

Great. Pushed. Thanks for the patch.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-08-22 18:33:57 Re: Is this a bug?
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2014-08-22 18:13:01 Re: 9.5: Better memory accounting, towards memory-bounded HashAgg