Re: potential bug in psql

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: potential bug in psql
Date: 2014-08-22 15:18:12
Message-ID: 20140822151811.GM6343@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> TBH, though, \s doesn't seem to me to be anywhere near worth the amount
> of work we've already put into it, let alone a major new implementation
> effort. Who's for just removing the command altogether?

I use it every once in a while. Is there a replacement? There are
several things I hate about it, such as it filling up the terminal
scroll buffer with junk, so if there are workable alternatives I'm more
than willing to listen.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Szymon Guz 2014-08-22 15:21:33 Re: potential bug in psql
Previous Message Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J] 2014-08-22 15:14:29 Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL